Which aspect is NOT considered when assessing the effectiveness of a fire mission?

When evaluating the effectiveness of a fire mission, the focus is primarily on the impact and outcome of the mission itself. Target damage assessment is crucial because understanding the extent of damage inflicted on the enemy's assets directly correlates with mission success. Adapting to mission changes is also an important consideration; the ability to adjust tactics and strategy in response to evolving battlefield conditions can significantly enhance the effectiveness of the fire support provided.

Achieved objectives represent the overall goals set prior to the mission and are critical in measuring whether the intended outcomes were met. This encompasses various factors, such as the neutralization of enemy forces and the accomplishment of specific strategic aims.

In contrast, the number of personnel involved is not a primary consideration when assessing mission effectiveness. While logistical aspects and the scale of operations may influence planning and execution, the actual effectiveness of a fire mission is not determined by the sheer number of personnel but rather by the success in achieving the defined military objectives and the impact on the target. Therefore, this aspect is less relevant to the overall assessment of mission effectiveness.