How are multiple targets of the same threat level prioritized?

The correct choice emphasizes the multifaceted approach to prioritizing targets based on multiple criteria, highlighting that all the listed factors play a role in determining which target to engage first.

Prioritizing "frontal before flank" indicates that targets presenting a direct threat are addressed before those that are more peripheral. This approach is crucial in ensuring that the most immediate threats are neutralized first, which enhances overall safety and effectiveness during engagement.

Engaging "stationary before moving" speaks to the tactical advantage of targeting stationary threats first, as they are easier to hit and present a more predictable danger. Moving targets may pose a dynamic challenge and can often be more difficult to engage effectively, especially under time constraints or adverse conditions.

The principle of "near before far" reflects the importance of addressing threats that are closer in proximity before those that are further away. Closer threats have a more immediate potential to cause harm, thus requiring prioritization to mitigate risks.

Therefore, choosing all these criteria as a collective method for prioritizing targets captures the essence of tactical decision-making in combat scenarios, where multiple dimensions must be considered to ensure the most effective engagement strategy.